Chanel N°5 by Chanel
For: women Designer: Chanel Olfactive Group: Floral AldehydeThe perfume became famous thanks to many celebrities who wore it, among which Marilyn Monroe. Chanel N°5 is often connected to her name because during an interview in 1954 she said that in bed she wore only ‘some drops of Chanel N°5'. That statement became a superb advertising slogan and a reason for millions of women around the world to choose this perfume. The current Chanel N°5 face is Nicole Kidman.
Ernest Beaux created two series of perfume samples numbered 1-5 and 20-24 and asked Coco Chanel to choose one of them. Madame Chanel chose the sample no. 5 and thus the perfume got its name. Superstitious, Chanel presented her new perfume on the fifth day of the fifth month of 1921.
Working on creation of this perfume, Ernest Beaux created and for the first time used the synthetic component – aldehydes. In his formula the aldehydes are accompanied by fragrances of rose and jasmine. The fragrance of aldehydes is pure and fresh, reminds of the odor of clean linen just brought in the house form the fresh frosty air. It is said that the famous creator drew his inspiration for creation of this fragrance from one of his visits to the Arctic Circle and the smell of water in midnight. The unique smell of frozen lakes and rivers fascinated him so much that he decided to replicate it in his creation.
Chanel N°5 is the first perfume in the floral-aldehyde group and the first by the quantity of aldehydes in its composition (another legend says that the Ernest Beaux's assistant overdosed the aldehydes in the composition by mistake). The top notes are composed of aldehydes, bergamot, lemon, neroli and ylang-ylang, the heart of jasmine, rose, lily of the valley and iris, while the base is created of vetiver, sandalwood, vanilla, amber and patchouli.
The first Chanel N°5 was captured in a simple rectangular bottle with the top which resembled Place Vendome in Paris. The first bottle was designed by Chanel herself and represents her classical principle – the less is more.
Chanel N°5 Fragrance Reviews:
add review



The holy grail of all perfumes
the most covented sort after perfumes
in the whole world. it's inspiered by
Artists Film Litature Actresses and Pop culture. the addicting scent of Aldehydes addes the powderly Element
the mixure of neroli citruses Jasmine
and it dries down to refined woods.
I Love the golden Licqur of this perfume
it reminds you walking though a Palace of Rare Gold. and i love the trade mark bottle very Simple not Gaudy Cheap loud Minimalistic Less is more
I Will give this a 5!


This review if for the perfume, I'm not in love with the edp or the edt. Just f.y.i....giggle



Fortunately there are a lot of perfumes for all of us, but we must have tolerance. Chanel No.5 has a loyal audience and let us enjoy it.

I like Coco, but I will never love this. I will update Fragrantica in 20 years or so, and I'll bet you my favorite bottle of perfume that I won't become enamoured with No 5. At least its not offensive to me, and I can say "I'm fine with this perfume, you can wear it of you like!" I've smelled it on far too many women to see the point of anyone else wearing it-Ladies, we need a new No 5!

so absolutely no problem about hating , bashing , even disrespecting a given materialistic object like a parfum like Chanel No5 . its just free points of view . & truely its a matter of nose , tendency & most importantly a matter of comforted choice.
For me , apparently i am an ardent loyal wearer not a mere follower , to the Grand favourite ( in my eyes ) No5 for over than 18 years & Yet i respect & admire the No5 enemies' ( haters' ) reviews or simply the non-appreciators' opinions . it never shook my Love & deep-seated Respect to it , on the contrary i grew more appreciating of the vastly varied tastes & inclinations in all of us as human-beings .
unfortunately i got sort of estranged highly different kind of taste in perfumery which obligates me to choose a perfume which would reflect as possible who i really am from the inside out , hence the severe coldness & distance i aspire to in my carefully selected choices , deeply contradicting most respected ladies in my life in their tastes & choices of their perfumes, who most often will dictate their preferences of being warm , inviting , comfortable-to-wear & certainly "lovable" types of perfumes ,
for example , No5 is deeply loved by me & mother severly rejected by all of my sisters & female relatives & friends , even my 85 years old English grand-mother says that No5 is a mere joke of a scent & never liked it or even respected it actually , only loving & wearing L'heure bleue & Mitsouko & none else .
so i wouldn't necessarily say that No5 is the absolute epitome of sheer femininty and class in a bottle , rather its a reputable feminine elegant & Melancholic choice of a classic French parfum .
At last but not least , i find myself partly agreeing to some point with the respected Wegee's & Jade Paloma's reviews down there.
Hopefully we are all innermostly beautiful & open-minded women at the last . thank you .

(edt) Neroli, ylang ylang, bergamot & aldehydes open this orchestration and if you're not a fan of any or all you should just avoid this altogether because your opinion will be formed long before you reach either the heart or base notes. There's no shame in not appreciating this opening chorus, but there's definitely no virtue in revealing your ignorance by trashing what you don't understand. Chacun a son gout or chacun a son nez. Keep your Jessicas, Jennifers, Britneys, Harijukus, etc.; that's OK. The priestesses of Chanel No.5 respect your preferences. But please, do not presume to insult that which you do not appreciate or understand.
No. 5's basenotes are distillations of years of experience, knowledge and confidence. No. 5 is estrogen embodied in juice that consists of mink, sable, fox fur, velvet, satin, rubies, emeralds and diamonds; the best tobacco, the best whiskey, the most glamorous and comfortable couture, the finest champagne, the oldest brandy, the most romantic of full moon's moonlight, the most powerful, sweaty & panting orgasm with your heart's desire... No. 5 is the honey, sand, sun and warmth of summer, the most melancholic of burning autumn leaves, the clearest of moonlight on winter's new fallen snow and the most energizing of spring's first blossoms. No. 5 is your lover whispering in your ear as you embrace before sleep... No. 5 is the heart, the soul and the scent of a woman. Girls, you just need to wait.
I have had the experience, however, of different bottles smelling completely different; some have been downright awful - a repeated occurance over the years and one that has put me off to the scent somewhat, as I am never sure what I am going to get. Chanel sales and customer service has never been helpful about this, and as a result, I have reluctantly migrated to the smaller and lighter eau de toilette which has been more consistent.
also - never liked Nicole Kidman, so her advertising it put me off it for a while - glad Audrey Tautou has done a gorgeous new ad!

If you can carry this fragrance off, lucky you!

Aldehydes pack a god awful punch and last far too long. Just when you think you'll give up on the fragrance the notes change (about 2 hours, too long to endure).
Only now do I embrace no 5 with all the love and admiration its reputation encourages. This is sensual, intimate and caressing.
But wait!
The bohemian warmth of amber and sandalwood has me reminded of an important milestone from my past and I smile with sweet reminiscent joy when I realise No 5 smells remarkably similar to the first fragrance I ever purchased.
I then laugh with hysterics
- the first perfume I ever wore was a cheap Indian oil named 'NIGHT GODDESS' which I purchased for $4 (Aus dollars) from one of those 'new age' stores.
I loved 'night goddess' then
I love 'Chanel no.5' now.
Some things never change.

yeah powder but is it regular or cheap ? Never , its Feminine Gold ( not golden ) powder with touch of darkness & injustifiable depressing effect.
subjectively : very tall ( 6ft. 2in. ) slender young ( 26 yr ) married physician with kohled-eyes , bitter tongue ,
ferocious nature , constantly smouldered light Merit cigarette in the left hand & ice-cold heart ,( yes unfortunately me ),,, Dr.Lioness in a Cage. Guess who is my zookeeper ? yeah Bravo No5 .
Received my 1st bottle of pure parfum Chanel No5 in my seventh birthday (do the math) , ever since been Contently beautified , mystified & saddened by my Cold , distant , cruel & rock-solid Keeper . How could I not fall for Him?



Then something happened, at the grand old age of 24 I had a No.5 epiphany. What once seemed musty and ancient now represented a beautiful, complicated, comforting femininity. I'd stop short of saying I have become addicted but I can't get enough. Unfortunately I have no idea of the vintage of the products I have in order to meaningfully review each but the EDT is definitely more "powdery" and softer- as you might expect and the parfum is as exquisite as a No. 5 aficionado might anticipate.
In three words- Classy, Feminine, Comforting.
i have never seen my grandmar my dad last her when he was 17 ... she was a nice lady and id like to at least have something that she used to wear
email me on ( ann_kelley@hotmail.co.uk )
most thank full
Anny Louise Kelley
yuck.


Well, at first whiff, soap. Really, I couldn't detect any other notes. Completely artificial is right. But Chanel No. 5 is not to be confused with a big bar of Dial. It has this light, sparkling quality to the opening that effuses like bubbles in champagne. It fizzed, tickled, and giggled in its journey up my nose. The cautious spray I took seemed to make the very air in the room brighter. The colors were sharper, as if your staticky TV set was suddenly replaced by HD.
But then . . . the drydown dissappointed me. It felt very cold. If Chanel No. 5 were a woman, she would be powerful and graceful and grand and unique and respected . . . but if you touched her, she would be cold all the time, like a statue. She doesn't seem quite human to me, and this prevents me from ever completely loving her. I think Chanel No. 5, the perfume, has grown to be a symbol, or an icon, more than an actual perfume. It's lovely, in a detached and distant manner. Even the concept, to create a completely unnatural scent, distances it from humanity. So the Chanel No. 5 character is perfect . . . but I can only imagine this woman in black and white photographs and in history books. I can't see her as a mother or a lover or as a young girl.
Arpege, on the other hand . . . completely different story.



I'll try Chanel No5 again in perhaps another 50 years time. Right now we lack chemistry !



Chanel No.5. One doesn't always fall in love straight away.


"Ah, well, silly me - I was 21 at the time", I thought to myself recently and decided to give it a try again as I was growing older. I was very lucky to get myself a bottle of an EDT by an accident and here's where the major revelation came... The first bottle which sent me in shock was an EDP! I could remember its aroma of staleness very well, a clumsy artificial monster crawling out of the old closet. Perfumes: The Guide reassured my guess that these two perfumes ARE different. As my tastes and life experience is growing, I do still think that edp is a mishap.
NOW, EDT is a milky-powdery peachy aldehydic heaven, a beautiful abstract bouquet of anonymous luxurious flowers - according to Gabrielle Chanel - a fragrance which is "artificial" and feels like a dress you can actually wear, a separate entity. It's earthy but doesn't smell like anything on earth. Verdict: Even though I feel like something is missing in this particular perfume, overall roundness maybe, depth? - I can still call Chanel №5 EDT the timeless epitome of class and femininity. Ladies, before dissmissing # 5 altogether, please try to test it in a pure parfum concentration. I believe it was originally meant to be enjoyed as PP. It IS the finest stuff available on planet Earth, it is in making after 80 years not just because of the marketing.

It's not my favourite perfume, it's a little too powdery for my taste, but it doesn't deserve to be marked as outdated, which it has been a lot lately. I think just because now many of the older generation wear it in remembrance of good old times, that doesn't make it out of date. Scents, like wine, are not fashion-bound for me. If they're good, they'll last. And a little Chanel No 5 with a little black dress definitely still does the trick for me.

I have finally grown into it , tried it occationally through the years and never liked it, it felt wrong - but as i tried it on now a while ago - a hit ! Its beautiful ,though it demands a lot from the carrier,not everybodys everyday cologne exactly..

If you do think of splashing out and buying some, take care to test the different forms first (EDP, EDT), as the scents do differ and will also change differently on your skin.

Firth of all the Neroli, Ylang Ylang and the lemon make a beautiful combination.. And then the Lily of valley, the rose and jasmine.. is just perfect.. some of the most beautiful flowers..
And then the Sandalow, patchulie and vertiver puts a lot of personality to close this fragance, these three elements are strong but combined with all that beautiful flowers make a perfect balance...
Chanel N5 smeel like old lady??? I pray to god that my grandmother could smells as well as N°5!!!

I personaly love aldehydes, they cause this lovely luminous effect on my skin; other aldehydic frags appeal to me personaly so maybe that's why I don't have a problem with this old girl.
It is a powdery scent & maybe for alot of people they equate powder with 'old ', I don't care , it's still a pleasant scent & its going to take alot more than a eighty year old scent like Chanel to make me worry I smell 'old' & decrepit to others..
There is a reason Chanel 5 is a classic for a reason, not just for its name - some of these newer flashier ones out now , yes they can be beautiful for sure, but how long will their fame last?

I grew up hating this scent for a long time- i thought it was classic and too much old fashioned. Bleh.. grandma scent!
That time I really adored nice candy and gourmand scents which were fantastic at that time.
Well, time passed and I got through few hundreds of perfume on my wrists and got attracted to various kinds of perfume- leathery, dry spices, etc etc etc... Still love gourmands, but..
Now N5 screams elegance to me. You can't think bad about a lady who wears N5. She's perfect no matter what clothes she has on.
I recommend edp and edt that has been manufactured this year. It's kinda reformulated and better than previous. Esp. edt.
Basically, in few words N5 smells of expensive soap. Or soap manufacturers copy N5 xD. Don't get scared of aldehydes. No nose biting off there. Timeless if Chanel doesn't ruin it lol, but seems after recent ref. it'll stay for few another decades.

I bet if this same garbage were not Chanel and came from a drugstore, the reviews would be a lot different. I find that so strange.
Anyways, I like sweet perfume, but I have an open mind. My perfume wardrobe consists of a little of everything.
I have been hearing about Chanel No. 5
since I can remember. How it is (or was for many decades ago before the internet and an enormous perfume variety worldwide) pretty much the quintessential classy ladies' perfume.
Well I decided to buy a sample from E-bay. I had a suspicion that something created in 1921 might just have that nasty, chemical, old lady who wears orange lipstick funk about it, but I figured "what the heck" and bought the sample. It's got to be good right?! With all the hype,and the association with so many powerful,sexy ladies maybe it's different.
Boy, was I wrong.I got my sample, and wow was I surprised -- unpleasantly. Upon the first spray, I got a torrent of stale, dried white flowers with a hint of piss.
I let it dry down a bit and it morphed into a waxy, mothballs/damp garage smell with a hint of "guest bathroom soap". You know the kind of fancy soap you put in the guest bathroom for looks, it's not really supposed to be used, and actually it stinks, but now it has dust on it because you haven't had overnight guests in like 5 years.
And finally, in the last stages it just smells like that scented Raid roach spray with a touch of Avon body powder. I'm glad I only bought the sample. Phew.
In 1921 when this was created, in a time with no air conditioning, deodorant, or running water, this might have smelled great in contrast to body odor. But with all the fresh scents available now, this just smells very stale and funky.
I could not imagine anyone under the age of 65 wearing this. If you wear creased pastel pants, and ivory knee-high stockings with open toe orthopedic sandals, then go for it. Ugly bottle, ugly scent, if it weren't for the name Chanel, this would have not sold a single drop.

Then decided to try it on my skin today.
You know when you have a fine dress, and don't know which jewel to wear, to combine with?
Chanel No. 5 is the perfect gem.


According to my experience: I think the women that not estimate Chanel nº5 are (more and less) the same type of women that dont like pearls... could be really bored in a museum but think its very "chic" to go to an 'art gallery'... that almost never can be un-maked-up... and always go to beauty saloon to cut their hairs exactly like suggestions of fashion and beauty magazines... Because many things like pearls, things of museums, dont use make.up or dont have a fashion hair-style are very OLD FASHIONED :)
I think Chanel nº5 (like any other fragrance) its good for any people that like it, independently of her age. Its a taste thing.
Personally, I really like it a lot since the first smell :D at my fifteen years. Its really beautiful, elegant and vibrant... and have something particular: many perfumery houses have fragrances similars to nº5... that could be considerate "soapy" "with aldehydes" "floral" "classic"...etc etc... but always we can know which one is nº5...because its very distinctive.
Thanks for read my defective english ;) jeje

You'd think from the perfume notes, which include lemon, that Chanel No.5 would be a fresh, light scent but I think it's the total opposite. It's definitely far better suited to a mature woman than any woman under the age of about 40.
I really dislike Chanel No.5!!



The other thing I believe is that nothing would have gained so much popularity if it wasn't worth it. Personally I've learned to appreciate and enjoy Chanel N5. I will definitely own it, as soon as I feel mature enough.

I think Chanel no.5 is very refined and ladylike, not sexy, just classy…real classic that can be a bit harsh for modern noses.Mme Chanel said she wanted a 'creation'; something almost false, and it was not meant to smell like flowers, but to be a part of woman’s accessory just like a dress…
It has been signature perfume of my mother for years and till now I always admire when she walks in… as the fog of Chanel no.5 is so intriguing.. very alluring and sensual…I always ask her what perfume she has on..and answer is always the same..Chanel no.5…
She layers it with Chanel no.5 body cream… simply beautiful!
I think it is classy old-fashioned perfume… very classy, and not for everyone, just like some Guerlain’s perfumes.. but still I think they are one of the best classy perfumes…

To my senses this stuff is piercing and gauche, and anything that needs hours to show itself, truly isn't worth the wait. It's time has passed.
Edit: to Kama... I have a modern nose??? Not exactly . I'm just not superficial. I won't buy a perfume that offends just about everyone I know just because of the status symbol attached to it. Being a snob does not reflect class. Everyone's body chemistry is different, And Chanel #5 CAN be horrendous on many people.

Heavily floral and cloying, I was ready to shower under the rain just to get the horrid scent off of me.
I dont care how much this fragrance is worth or how famous it is, I wouldnt even want it even if it were cheap.

I love the most beautiful EdT.


Guess what? I'm in love!
Yes it's soapy and powdery (wich I love by the way) and grown up, but this perfume has something that lacks in almost every perfume I've smelled until today: aura!
It's pure class in a bottle!
Ok it suits in a very different way that suits my mum, but I really really can´t stop sniffing myself!
Vulgar? Heavy? Old? - No way!
Rich, sultry, sensual... simply unforgettable!


to me = not ok
i got headache trying this.
bought my mom this one though, and it ends great on he.
but i'm obviously not going to wear it.ever.




Update: I think this one has a permanent place in my perfume wardrobe, it puts many to shame, when I smell a lot of the new perfumes that are too sweet and too cheap smelling. There is a reason chanel n°5 has stayed! It's a masterpiece!




I actually find it quite amazing that No.5 has become such a popular scent worn by almost every perfumista at some point in their perfume life. I think it is a very pretty and confident perfume, but it definitely has an original edge to it that I didn't think all women would like - which they don't, if you read women's reviews.
I'm gonna have to return to this review after I've had a good moment of new study with No.5. All I can say for sure is that I would define No.5 as a soft, round and comforting smell that is in no way too safe or dull. In fact, I don't think it suits as many women as it is worn by. It takes confidence to wear No.5, which too many women often lack - unnecessarily. And also vice versa: not all women actually know what a legendary and original perfume they're wearing when they wear No.5 - they only know they love what they're wearing. Maybe that's what it boils down to with No.5. It is perfect for both regular and evening wear; can be worn with a jumper and an evening dress, which is quite rear when it comes to perfumes.

it's just too heavy and horrible..but I dont know..i just dont like it on me
when i smell it to other people it makes me sneeze ;(



My mother always wore the eau de cologne formulation, and it smelled wonderful on her, but I never enjoyed the powderiness. Turns out I was trying the wrong strength.
I just bought a bottle of extrait de parfum - it was old, it had been opened and used, but the price was very cheap - and tried it, and I am stunned. I thought I knew what No. 5 smelled like, but I really had no idea.
The parfum does open with those scintillating, bright aldehydes, along with some citrus I had never smelled before. After an hour or so, the heart really begins to blossom, with florals blended so skillfully that it's difficult to pick out what one is smelling. I know there is rose and jasmine, but I cannot smell each individually. This stage is warm and delicious and inviting, casting a golden glow all around me. It finally dries down to a beautifully rich base of sandalwood, vetiver, and musk.
I've heard this saying before, with regards to classic perfumes, and I repeat it now: TRY THE PARFUM!

All three strengths (EdT, EdP, and Parfum) have a different interpretation. The parfum is the only one that contains Chanel's special type of jasmine from Grasse and is exclusive the them and them only. It is definitely evident when compared to the EdP, which incorporates jasmine from different regions of the world. The parfum is unmistakably feminine and sweet (of jasmine). The EdP is my favorite, created sometime in the 80s, I believe. It contains more woody and leather like nuances. It communicates an assertive strength. The EdT seems to contain a lot of citrus and seems to make you wonder what this perfume is all about.
Bottom line, it is definitely a classic and is deserving of a permanent place in perfumery. IMO, I am not a Nose, but I seem to think that No. 5 needs more work in filling in the "spaces" in the perfume. The transitions can be a bit rough, as if the perfume was rushed, but many of those who enjoy this perfume might not really notice it.
People who seem to not like No. 5 is usually those who do not warm up to aldehydes. Hopefully No. 5 Eau Premiere gives them a chance to wear No. 5's mystique comfortably.


There are a lot of aldehydes in this perfume, though I detect a lot more of them in the EDP, as opposed to the EDT, which seems lighter and more citrusy to my nose.
I don't get a lot of complexity from No. 5; there is a lot of jasmine, rose, powder (probably the iris) and maybe just a slight touch of vanilla, which is hard to detect. I do get a very strong scent of almonds, at least for the first couple of hours, after which, there's the smell of waxiness that a lot of older scents (like Mitsouko) tend to have (that might be civet). I don't care for the waxiness and think the perfume would be better without it, but overall, it's lovely and a classic and the wax is worth putting up with to enjoy such a legendary fragrance.
It's not for me, yet. I'm still a Coco/Coco Mademoiselle girl, but maybe I'll enjoy wearing it someday when I'm older, as I've grown to like it a lot more over the past decade when I've revisited it.


Sadly, it's the latter for No5 & me...my Marilyn seductress fantasies will never come to fruition. Those aldehydes & syntheic delights make me feel nauseus & headachey & I can't even try to enjoy other facets of this classic.
It does, however, bring back distant memories of opening ancient powder compacts, then sneaking a dab from the huge bottle belonging to a fabulously tweedy lady who said "THEY say perfume, WE say scent". I thought the powdery, soapy chemically headache haze I sniffed was frightfully grown-up & what all true ladies would wear.
So, maybe I'll never wear No5, but it was nice to take a trip down memory lane.
But i recognize that it's a conservative scent, luxury scent, with too much class, lasting, etc...

Chanel No. 5 is the ultimate statement in class and femininity. It is multi-layered and long-lived, and takes a good six hours or so to fully reveal itself. Soapy, sophisticated aldehydes yield to my favorite phase, the beautiful floral heart notes, in about 20 minutes. The florals linger for a couple hours, and then begins one of the most incredible dry-downs in perfume history. Over the next few hours, there are distinct phases of sweet vanilla, then less sweet vanilla-amber, then a dry woodsy amber and finally the last hints of patchouli and vetiver. What a work of art!
If it's not the right time in your life for you to wear it, it won't smell pleasant to you. But come back and visit No. 5 again in two years, five years or even 10 years. On one of these later visits, when the time is right, you'll catch a whiff and your nose will respond with a deep and satisfying, "Yesssssssssssss!"



I got it as a present from a charming gentleman, just like in old movies.
It reminds me of Marilyn Monroe.
Its very intimate and the best time to wear it is when you are with your lover, in bed, dressed up in a white silk night gown, your hair curled, falling gently down your chest, soft red lips, passionate eyes who show the deepest darkest places of your soul..
because this is a 'Parfum', with the big P; so perfect, so sophisticated, so elegant, so gentle, so strong, so cosy.. cosy is the right word, cosy and luxurious, a real diamond, and as a diamond it will last forever, just like Marilyn.





Perhaps it is my young age that makes me dislike most Chanel fragrances, but I respect them for being universally recognised and incredibly popular. This fragrance is very dependant on a person with the right skin chemistry, sophistication, class and maturity. On the wrong person it could be a disaster.

A bouqet of abstract flowers with an indefinable femininity and a legendary elegance.
It's a refined floral soft fragrance. This feminine scent possesses a blend of modern florals and balanced notes.


It is still around for good reason!

I adore classic perfumes and stay away from anything melony, sugary, or even vanilla and musk; I also happen to adore floral aldehydes.
But this one... It's one of the few perfumes that give me an actual headache, and its scent is just clinging, and HEAVY (not in a good way, more like a sledge hammer ;-)
The one time I was wearing it, I actually left a party so I could go and scrub it off me ASAP! (A quick visit to the bathroom to wash my wrists and back of the neck didn't help.)
Worst of all, I find it doesn't evoke ANYTHING in me: no images, no yearnings... nothing. Perfumes always tend to evoke more or less poetic descriptions in me (as is usual with fragrance lovers - witness the comments on this very website ;).
But this one... I couldn't describe it in a poetic way, if my life depended on it.
I do like Chanel's "Nro 19" and "Mademoiselle", though. And they like me. ;)
Just doesn't agree with me, sorry, I use it as room freshener!
19 I love, the Allures and Coco Mademoiselle all wonderful.




And there's a note I can't stand. It's sharp and annoyingly too fresh. Huh aldehydes... It's very soapy on me. Whenever I wear it it reminds me of my grandma, whenever I smell it on others... it's gorgeous.
Anyway this fragrance is something very unique, but only because it has history. I'll try it again sometime...

Stays on me almost all day.






Sorry... I really didn't like it



Faded away on the spot every time it touched my skin though, too bad !




It's classy and powerful scent!
Unforgettable!




my sister's signature scent and the ONLY person i think of when i smell it...therefore it smells like someone i love and cherish.




Become a memeber of this online perfume community
Click here its free and easy!
This page contains information, reviews, perfume notes, pictures, new ads, vintage posters and videos about Chanel Chanel N°5 fragrance. If you have more information about Chanel Chanel N°5, you can expand it by adding a personal perfume review. Fragrantica has a unique user driven classification system and you may classify Chanel N°5 by Chanel. Click on the appropriate options on the fragrance classification form below. Also, you can find links to 3rd party websites/Internet stores, but Fragrantica has no access or control over those websites. We do not make guarantees nor accept responsibility for what you might find as a result of these links, or for any future consequences. User reviews of Chanel N°5 by Chanel are representing views of credited authors alone and do not necessary reflect Fragrantica's views.
Please, classify the fragrance. Choose the descriptions which really match this perfume.
Results of voting for perfume Chanel N°5 - Chanel:
Based on 539 votes of memebers.


























Mandarin
Orchid
Satsuma
Perfume Oil
White Musk
White Hot
Summer
Oceanus
Lotus Petal
The Apple
Blossom
Moroccan Rose
Love ETC
Cassis Rose