Gucci Guilty Intense Pour Homme Gucci for men

Intense of an already bad fragrance. Is this the same company that gave us Gucci Nobile? Sigh.. Please bring back Nobile.

Intense guilty, but how intense is it? It survived more than 6 hours, even after bath! Potent stuff, be warned.

The sourness wt citrusy first note disappear so fast in minutes and the strong powdery heavy ambery patchoulli scent last hours..... this is not a everyday fragrance, great winter frag but nothing special.

Test it before make purchase, it may not be everybody taste as the sour first note remind me a big pot of rotten oranges plus strong vinegar!

this is a perfect kopie of kiton men aramis

I dont want to share how good this stuff smells because I dont want everyone else smelling like me but how can I keep such extasy away from humanity? For the first time in my life I’m going back to buy another bottle of the same cologne in less then a week just to know I have back up. Gucci Guilty intense is an addiction. I spray it everywhere on my body. I can’t get enough of it and everyone who smells it on me loves it too! its just such a sexy scent that is unparalleled by ANY of today’s other fragrances. The only thing that comes within striking distance is the Dior Pour Homme. I think all the bad reviews must be for the guilty non intense as that fragrance has little to no longevity once it hits the air but the Intense stays on my skin for up to 24 hours. Very unique and powdery sweet patchouli, neroli, orange blossom scent. Lots of compliments. I find it very silly to say this is a poorly made fragrance or that its a flop. Get real folks, this stuff has been on back order for a month at most places and very few returns. Despite what Bloomingdales website says there is no means EDP-only EDT. But it is strong enough. Please my fellow fragrance lovers ,DONT JUDGE this Cologne par excellence by its scentless brother.

Projections: 10
Uniqueness: 10
Overall quality: Infinite

I respect everyone's opinion but seriously...this one is well-made !!! the only reason why it got many bad reviews is cuz this bottle is ahead of time..its too advanced for people at this time being... Trust me, I got many compliments and I love it!

Friends don't do this to friends! So why is Gucci's doing this to us.

All I can say is, shame, shame, shame. This, is Intensely boring. A space waster. And, with so mediocre frags by name brands already confusing the public what is the purpose?

So why bother launching a scent that really serves no purpose? Not sure of Gucci's thinking. Since they have some note worthy ones, why not re-promote those instead of relegating them to the dust pin of drug stores and street fairs?

The notes are really a jumble. Really is not worth the time to review. Run from this!!!

Gucci Yawn ....

the new boring fragrance....


The Mistake....is now... Intense!!



Gucci should be ashamed of puttin their label on this thing, after realeasing masterpieces like pour homme and pour homme II. my tip, take a shower with a nice soap, ignore this..... make it flop!!!


Dear Gucci, dont insist here, I have two words for you



TOM FORD

Guilty Pour Homme itself is not a bad fragrance. It's a powdery less citrusy variation of Chanel Allure Homme Sport, people around rather like it. The only problem lies in its longevity, but in Intense version this issue has been improved.

Re:K1's comment,

Why dont they just bring back Rush? Giving us Gucci by Gucci and Guilty were mistakes in my opinion.
Gucci by Gucci-sport was better than the first edition, but weak as.
Gucci by Gucci seemed to target simplicity among mediocre, masculine scents, but would do well to be a simple scent if marked down, which means, to get a good profit margin, they'd have to cheapen the formula and it'd be toilet spray. Guilty seemed to lack recognition of Hugo Boss, and results in a release and marketing campaign for something that turned out just like a Boss frag(i think it was Boss Soul). Its only at low cost and low expectations that either of these should be successful, so to not waste money on ad campaigns and getting their hopes up.

IMO, bring back Rush, stop advertising Gucci by Gucci, just p**s Guily off completely and spend a good deal of effort creating something different.

Yet another disaster.

bat man's fragrance.

this is not a fragrance.its just a smell. a sexy nauseating fresh play-doh sweat smell.off putting and inviting at the same time. my nose felt confused.it is similar to the original, linear, better longevity but silage stayed the same. Feels like there is no structure. i call this gucci chaos. very expensive and cheap smelling.chaotic indeed.

I really like this one, it is really sexy! I am a girl, and only tried it on myself, however (got a sample at the mall and couldn't resist!)but I plan on giving the sample to my bf and seeing if he likes it. I love the crisp, citrusy yet slightly spicy top notes--I think I like it even more than the women's!

Bought it today and all I can say is not bad. It smells similar to the original and the scent is very linear, doesn't change much from start to finish.

It lasts more than 6 hours on my skin. Projection is moderate for the first 4 hours, then becomes close to the skin.

Worth check it out guys.

Well, it's not bad as the original version. It opens so much better for example. It opens a bit in a niche way but quickly loses it and turns to its style till the end and unlike the prior, it's linear and without muddy mood. But not yet my style.
By the way, lemony blossomy pattern marvels in dry down, so pity that no power remains to spread it out.

With just one spritz on my wrist, Lavender is not there, but I definitely get more of this sensual amber; making the scent smooth with oriental-like quality. Patchouli is quite pronounced while orange blossom is mild and not at all feminine. cedar is hardly there either unless I really dig into it. Not much similarities between this and original, though. (it's kinda like Prada Amber and Prada Amber Intense)

So Gucci Guilty Intense may be just a warmer and denser version of the original. Neither one is successful, I think. But when it comes down to one winner, I'd go with this Intense because I'm more of an amber fan.

Call me crazy, but I really like this. It's definitely not 'loud', but smells very nice. Nothing profound, but nice. 7/10

I take that back... the lasting power is equivalent to it's original. Guilty Intense is indeed Guilty of deceiving you during the first phase of the dry-down. It has all of the characteristics of a fragrance assumed to hold, and then it becomes very sheer. A richer concentration, yes. It also has the same vanishing abilities. ::Sigh:: The Mass Market.

Does "Intense" always need to reflect "intensely poor"? I'm not expecting a lot, but the same type of quality I experienced in the 2003 Gucci Pour Homme.

This doesn't do it for me in the sense that it dries almost immediately into an amber, albeit a very ordinary and synthetic amber that lacks any surrounding character. No sharpness, no character, linear, synthetic and cheap feeling. In a word, not out-and-out terrible and perhaps a decent bow to the masses, but entirely forgettable and unremarkable.

Gucci, how you've let me down once again.

I just got sprayed by SA in Nordstroms and I had to run to wash my hand-wrist. This stuff have so much marketing and they are so pushy to sell it. They keep saying is the #1 fragrance in USA. Oh marketing! if I wasn't working in this field...
This stuff is very Miami old-Cuban-lady-like. Sorry Cubans but you know what I am talking about :)

A fruity modern scent which is similar to some female scents...

0-5 mins - Sticky, fruity smell with modern male twist. Projection good- approx 1.5 foot around. Ages 20-35.

5 mins - 3.5 hours - Modern twist goes and this becomes a nice sticky and fruity smell. Smells like a little orange, but this is not listed. Projects 1 foot around so does not fill the room. Very similar to Female Hugo Boss Intense or Female Georgio Armani Diamonds EDP, perhaps they project a little longer than this though.

3.5 hours - 8 hours. Drydown ok, a little spicy very now and then - smelt cumin but this is not listed. Rare whiff of projection, otherwise projection all gone

Not for me, so many fruity sticky smells around and this is no better than those others. Also, I want more projection and for longer, however for many this will project enough. Nice enough

Although I must admit to it's added strength and lasting abilities, it is still very much a synthetic bomb. I've noticed lately, designers have had a battle of the bottles competition in session. Most of the effort seems to be occurring outside of the bottle.

It's alive and kicking in Harrods. Very, very mediocre. Very.

I think you're all full of it. This is one of the best frags I've smelled in awhile.

This was a DISAPPOINTMENT from Gucci..it's stinks so bad,that there were time's I could'nt wait to take a shower..throw my bottle away..
not impressed at all..cheap and sticky..

One of the worst colognes i have ever smelled!!
smells cheap.

Does anyone have any info on Guilty intense for women. I also know there should be a version for women but it will come out in the UK first.

I think it is real because there will be also womens version called "intense"...

I don't think this is real - that bottle looks like it was done in photo shop.

I agree with "VogueBoy"
When something is cheap, launching an intense version is just another unwise response unless it be in a different theme which is not obviously (according to the notes). Instead of wasting money and releasing a disaster nose torturer, they could get on with Gucci pour homme (2003) to re-continue that absolute masterpiece.
Anyway, the scent itself is the matter and I hope this one be something deserving our collection.

If it is intense, it must intensely bad. As many said, what is the use of launching a scent that smells like laundry detergent? Do we have to imagine this smells like an amplified version of Skip? Are they trying to improve what has been done with the original Tommy? Marketing mysteries, or marketing flaws, I guess.

Instead of launching an Intense NOTHING, they could use the money they spent on that, in charities. At least..

Why to do "intenseL version of any ordinary and cheap drug-store-like fragrance? Gucci have discontinued the classic Pour Homme and started to produce these cheap waters :(

It kinda does doesn't it? Here's hoping it is real cuz the original isn't anything to go crazy about. I'm hoping Intense means better. Haha. : )